|
Post by Roscoe, TFFN Reporter (Ret) on Dec 25, 2009 7:33:07 GMT
In that case Meadow i'm quite glad you're not offering as my pathetic attempt at a workbook would probably make you ROFLYAO ;D
Anyway, from the replies above i've come to the conclusion that most people don't deserve better after all and probably aren't that bothered anyway so here is the Christmas No1 as promised.
And here's the shock- the PRA takeover is complete as Loy PRA leads the standings as Christmas Day dawns and a surprise appearance for Roscoe. Hey! that's me! ;D
TEN-POT ELITE LEAGUE
1 Loy PRA 20 2 amber 16 3 sultan 11 4 frankiegth10 4 robotsmfc 10 6 Peekay 9 7 meadow 8 8 daza b 7 8 J-esagPRA7 10 roscoe 5
PREMIER LEAGUE
1 coops 4 2 loudefc 3 3 aleman 2 3 bigmark 2 3 davetscfc 2 3 Leeds WCFC2 3 thevicar 2 3 votp 2 3 giggy 2 9 ifreakinrule1 10 bh 1 11 cuckoo 1
Welcome to LeedsWCFC who made his first appearance on TPT.
It was noted that ISIHAC hasn't put in an appearance this month so far. I hope that this is not down to any illness or crisis.
Merry Xmas and Happy New Year. God Bless us every one.
|
|
|
Post by ambersalamander on Dec 25, 2009 16:41:09 GMT
How sweet same to you A routine tidy up of my pendrive at work this morning revealed that i'd merely tidied up the back up workbook into a folder instead of deleting it is i'd first feared so the TTPL will have a Xmas No1 after all ;D YAY! I doubt I'm in the Elite though. If anyone is interested, though, i can send out a back up workbook to them at the end of each month just in case of any future mishaps. Erm... no ta, I've got enough football related worksheets/spreadsheets on my 'puter as it is. <alarm goes off 'geek mode, geek mode'> You're on your own. At least you got "your" and "you're" the right way round...but you always do!
|
|
|
Post by Roscoe, TFFN Reporter (Ret) on Jan 1, 2010 8:03:33 GMT
Happy New Year to all Tinpotters. The best of health, wealth and happiness to us all. ;D
As it sems to have fallen to me to "first-foot" my figuerative lump of coal will be the latest TTPL tables ;D
Cogratualtions to Loy PRA who topped the December Elite League standings
TEN-POT ELITE DEC 09
1 Loy PRA 30 2 amber 22 3 sultan 19 4 frankiegth13 4 meadow 13 6 robotsmfc 10 7 Peekay 9 8 daza b 7 8 J-esagPRA7 10 roscoe 6
This months TEN-POT Next ten comprised 13 ten-potters. Welcome to our newest poster, old wimbledonian.
TEN-POT NEXT TEN DEC 09
1 aleman 5 1 loudefc 5 3 coops 4 4 bh 3 5 bigmark 2 5 davetscfc 2 5 giggy 2 5 Leeds WCFC 2 5 thevicar 2 5 votp 2 11 cuckoo 1 12 ifreakinrule 1 13 old wimbledonian 1
|
|
|
Post by Roscoe, TFFN Reporter (Ret) on Jan 1, 2010 8:09:28 GMT
And now the overall standings sice the big kick-off in August..
TEN-POT ELITE LEAGUE
amber 269 robotsmfc 172 sultan 129 daza b 116 isihac 116 frankiegth107 meadow 71 loy PRA 57 Peekay 55 coops 52
TEN-POT NEXT TEN
aleman 44 J-esagPRA44 giggy 38 davetscfc 37 bh 33 votp 32 medibot 30 cuckoo 20 loudefc 20 roscoe 20
TEN-POT NON-LEAGUE
thevicar 19 bigmark 12 skif 8 ifreakinrule4 ojiveojive 4 croc 3 Leeds WCFC2 MiB TFC 1 old wimbledonian1
|
|
|
Post by Roscoe, TFFN Reporter (Ret) on Jan 1, 2010 8:16:24 GMT
...and the Jan 10 standings so far...
TEN-POT ELITE LEAGUE
1 Roscoe 3
eat my dust!!!!! ;D
|
|
|
Post by bh on Jan 1, 2010 16:38:14 GMT
Oh dear relegation now slipping down the league!!!
|
|
|
Post by J Esaj PRA on Jan 5, 2010 18:35:33 GMT
Are the tables on here as faulty as all the other tables pooped out by the media? It appears there's some bias when ordering competitors with equal point tallies - I assume you are using the correct mechanism in these situations...
|
|
|
Post by ambersalamander on Jan 5, 2010 20:38:28 GMT
Alphabetical order my friend...
|
|
|
Post by robotsmfc on Jan 5, 2010 22:51:14 GMT
Nice: not posted in a while and still #2
|
|
|
Post by loy PRA on Jan 5, 2010 23:22:09 GMT
Nice: not posted in a while and still #2 Well done. Keep it up.
|
|
|
Post by robotsmfc on Jan 5, 2010 23:55:29 GMT
Hopefully my social calendar will continue to be sufficiently packed for it to continue.
|
|
|
Post by AFC J Esaj PRA on Jan 6, 2010 10:29:35 GMT
Alphabetical order my friend... Since when has alphabetical order been a valid criteria for sorting 'tables of achievement'? If two entities cannot be separated by the criteria use in the table, their relative position in the table is random. Just because the mass media is clueless it doesn't mean standards have to slip here, does it? I'm going to change my user name to AFC J Esaj (PRA)...
|
|
|
Post by ambersalamander on Jan 6, 2010 12:43:59 GMT
Yes, but "criteria" and "media" are both plural
|
|
|
Post by AFC J Esaj PRA on Jan 6, 2010 14:30:32 GMT
Both are perfectly acceptable in the given contexts. The statistical error is harder to dodge (although I know how I'd wriggle out of it).
|
|
|
Post by ambersalamander on Jan 6, 2010 16:52:35 GMT
I beg to differ, friend. "Media" as a shorthand for a collective group of entities perhaps, but you cannot have "a criteria" in any context - you would need to say "criterion"
|
|