|
|
Post by roofless on May 8, 2006 17:30:51 GMT
Yea sorry, finished second from bottom, I think I was a bit confused when I wrote it, but for once I do actually agree with you (although there's nothing to agree with really!) that Alty have had the points deducted and are therefore bottom of the league!
|
|
davetscfc
Steaming Bovril
......and it's Salisbury City......
Posts: 457
|
Post by davetscfc on May 8, 2006 21:47:18 GMT
I'm getting a flippin headache. One good thing, at least by moving up to Step 2 we are no longer "on the borders" and unlike the last 2 summers don't have to debate whether we're going from Southern to Ryman to Southern and back again.
Salisbury City - 4 seasons - 4 leagues!
|
|
|
|
Post by DazaB_WCFC on May 9, 2006 0:00:40 GMT
Back to something earier... If Canvey are resigning from the league, why should they have the right to decide which league to drop in to? It is not fair on the other teams in my opinion. They don't have any "right" to decide, they can apply for whichever league they wish (or in Canvey's case, a league in which they believe they can compete successfully) and then it is up to the league and the FA to decide if the application is successful. Fair enough, do both the league and the FA have to agree? |
|
|
|
Post by coops on May 9, 2006 10:07:57 GMT
They don't have any "right" to decide, they can apply for whichever league they wish (or in Canvey's case, a league in which they believe they can compete successfully) and then it is up to the league and the FA to decide if the application is successful. Fair enough, do both the league and the FA have to agree? It's more down to the league, they would have the final say on who they want in their competition, the FA would probably just apply a little pressure if no leagues wanted to take a club on. In practice there is rarely a problem as, due to the very nature of non-league football, there is inevitably a space created somewhere as clubs fold or drop down themselves. |
|
|
|
Post by frankiegth on May 11, 2006 21:14:09 GMT
Tamworth are now safe as Canvey Island have resigned.
Job done.
Congratulations on your survival.
|
|
|
|
Post by ambersalamander on May 12, 2006 15:34:18 GMT
Oh dear, does that mean carsh*ton are staying up?  Ooh hang on- just checked- they're not. |
|
|
|
Post by coops on May 12, 2006 20:50:47 GMT
Oh dear, does that mean carsh*ton are staying up? Ooh hang on- just checked- they're not. Noe here's a dodgy one. either Leigh RMI or Carshalton could have been saved, Leigh finished with one less point than Carshalton yet Leigh have been reprieved. how doe that work? |
|
|
|
Post by ambersalamander on May 12, 2006 23:14:07 GMT
it's to do with where they live or something |
|
|
|
Post by roofless on May 13, 2006 8:21:23 GMT
Maybe noone likes Carshalton?
|
|
|
|
Post by frankiegth on May 13, 2006 8:51:04 GMT
Don't know how true it is but I've heard Carshealton are lodging an appeal, I believe on the grounds that they had more points than Leigh and that is the govorning factor not, geographical location. As I say, don't know how true the rumour is, it could be a load of the proverbial. |
|
|
|
Post by roofless on May 13, 2006 9:34:18 GMT
I wouldn't blame them if they did, if a team with less points had stayed up over Tamworth I would be so unamused!!
|
|
|
|
Post by ambersalamander on May 13, 2006 9:49:56 GMT
I'm pretty sure that rumour is true but I'm even more sure that NOBODY knows what's going on- that's non-league football for you!
|
|
|
|
Post by ojiveojive on May 14, 2006 22:20:16 GMT
Leigh actually had the same number of points as Carshalton but had one deducted for an ineligible player.
|
|
|
|
Post by coops on May 14, 2006 22:53:27 GMT
Leigh actually had the same number of points as Carshalton but had one deducted for an ineligible player. So therefore had one less then??!! |
|
|
|
Post by ojiveojive on May 14, 2006 23:01:04 GMT
Yup
|
|
