Post by ambersalamander on May 4, 2006 11:46:17 GMT
My villain of the week is our lovely homophobic local paper!
I don't know anyone who reads it, actually, but the MAIN FRONT PAGE HEADLINE is as follows:
"LESBIAN MUM TO "WED" LOVER"
Followed by the sub-heading:
"And daughter is in a gay relationship too."
Oh my God! Filthy dykes exist in Sutton! I thought they'd all been burnt at the stake years ago. What a scandal to tarnish the innocent and blameless citizens of Sutton and Epsom!
(In fact, I just had a shufti at Sutton's crime figures for March of this year. In just the one month: 248 counts of violence against the person, 17 sexual assaults, 45 robberies, 118 burglaries, but apparently NO homophobic crimes. No wonder, really. Who'd want to report one with this kind of attitude prevailing?)
Now, local papers are often very silly, but it's usually in a fluffy kind of way. I have a problem with this one, for the following reasons:
1) What business is it of theirs?
2) What business is it of ours?
3) Two people who presumably love each other are wishing to make their union official. Why belittle this by referring to it in inverted commas?
4) I personally have no time for this "same sex parents cannot bring up a child as well as mixed couples can" bulls**t. Anyway, if the daughter is old enough to have a girlfriend then what difference could it make?
5) How could this possibly be the MAIN EVENT, i.e. worthy of the main story, among a population of over 200,000? The London Borough of Sutton's estimated population is 179,768 while that of the Borough of Epsom and Ewell is 27,065. They might as well make next week's headline, "MOTHER TO MARRY MAN! DAUGHTER HAS A BOYFRIEND TOO!!!" SCANDAL! People are having sex!
All right. Rant over.
I don't know anyone who reads it, actually, but the MAIN FRONT PAGE HEADLINE is as follows:
"LESBIAN MUM TO "WED" LOVER"
Followed by the sub-heading:
"And daughter is in a gay relationship too."
Oh my God! Filthy dykes exist in Sutton! I thought they'd all been burnt at the stake years ago. What a scandal to tarnish the innocent and blameless citizens of Sutton and Epsom!
(In fact, I just had a shufti at Sutton's crime figures for March of this year. In just the one month: 248 counts of violence against the person, 17 sexual assaults, 45 robberies, 118 burglaries, but apparently NO homophobic crimes. No wonder, really. Who'd want to report one with this kind of attitude prevailing?)
Now, local papers are often very silly, but it's usually in a fluffy kind of way. I have a problem with this one, for the following reasons:
1) What business is it of theirs?
2) What business is it of ours?
3) Two people who presumably love each other are wishing to make their union official. Why belittle this by referring to it in inverted commas?
4) I personally have no time for this "same sex parents cannot bring up a child as well as mixed couples can" bulls**t. Anyway, if the daughter is old enough to have a girlfriend then what difference could it make?
5) How could this possibly be the MAIN EVENT, i.e. worthy of the main story, among a population of over 200,000? The London Borough of Sutton's estimated population is 179,768 while that of the Borough of Epsom and Ewell is 27,065. They might as well make next week's headline, "MOTHER TO MARRY MAN! DAUGHTER HAS A BOYFRIEND TOO!!!" SCANDAL! People are having sex!
All right. Rant over.